Villanueva v. Barcroft
District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2011-09-30 · cited 14×
This case arose from plaintiff Bertha Villanueva's lawsuit against defendants including Martin York and others, alleging breach of contract, fraud, unjust enrichment, and related claims stemming from an investment in a collateral mortgage obligation program that required wiring funds to an escrow agent. The defendants moved to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction, improper venue, or alternatively to transfer venue, citing a forum selection clause in the escrow and profit agreements. The court granted the motion to dismiss without prejudice, holding that the clause was applicable and binding, which rendered venue in the Northern District of Ohio improper and directed resolution of disputes in Michigan. This decision made rulings on the plaintiff's partial summary judgment motion, the motion to withhold ruling, and the motion for default judgment unnecessary, so those were denied without prejudice.