This case, Allen v. State, was a criminal appeal before the Indiana Court of Appeals under docket number 49A02-1111-CR-1053. On July 12, 2012, the court issued a decision authored by Judge Barnes, with Judges Friedlander and May concurring, that affirmed the trial court’s ruling in part and remanded the case for further proceedings in part. The provided excerpt contains no information about the underlying facts, the issues presented on appeal, or the court’s legal reasoning.
The case ALEA LONDON, LTD. v. NAGY was an appeal to the Indiana Court of Appeals from a trial court decision involving the named parties. The Court of Appeals reversed the lower court's ruling and remanded the case for further proceedings. Judge Barnes wrote the opinion, which was joined by Judges Friedlander and May. No additional facts, issues, or legal analysis appear in the excerpt provided.
In City of Indianapolis v. Buschman, the case arose after Rachael Buschman was rear-ended by a police officer and submitted a tort claim notice to the City stating only property damage to her vehicle ($960.99), with an explicit statement of "No injuries," along with supporting documents; two years later she filed a lawsuit alleging personal injuries including hip and back pain and herniated discs from the same accident. The trial court granted summary judgment to Buschman, finding her notice sufficient under the Indiana Tort Claims Act. The Court of Appeals reversed, holding that the notice did not substantially comply with the Act's requirements to describe the extent of the loss and amount of damages sought. The court reasoned that the notice's specific and definitive statements limiting the claim to property damage and denying any injuries failed to inform the City of any potential personal injury liability, so it did not afford the City a reasonable opportunity to investigate that aspect of the claim; any later-discovered injuries would have required a timely amendment to the original notice.
The case of Clements v. Albers reached the Indiana Court of Appeals as a civil matter (designated PL) involving an appeal from a lower court ruling. In a June 25, 2012, decision authored by Judge Barnes, the court affirmed the trial court's outcome and remanded the case for further proceedings, with Judges Baker and Brown concurring. The provided excerpt contains no facts, issues, arguments, or legal analysis explaining the dispute or the basis for the affirmance.
The provided excerpt from Auto Liquidation Center, Inc. v. Bates contains no facts about the underlying dispute between the parties, the claims raised, or the trial court's ruling. The Indiana Court of Appeals issued a per curiam-style decision in which Judge Barnes, joined by Judges Friedlander and May, affirmed the judgment below and remanded the case for further proceedings. No substantive reasoning, legal analysis, or discussion of the issues appears in the excerpt.
This case, Nikolayev v. Nikolayev, was an appeal to the Indiana Court of Appeals from a trial court decision in a domestic relations matter. In an unpublished memorandum decision issued on May 31, 2012, the appellate court affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded the case for further proceedings. Judge Barnes authored the decision, with Judges Friedlander and May concurring. The provided excerpt contains no facts, issues, or legal reasoning from the underlying dispute or the court's analysis.