Jackson-Rabon v. State Employees' Retirement System
Michigan Court of Appeals · 2005-06-22 · cited 1×
The case involved a state employee's application for nonduty disability retirement benefits under MCL 38.24 after the State Employees’ Retirement Board denied her claim, finding that while her disability was total, she had not proven it was permanent. The circuit court reversed the board and ordered benefits, concluding that the board's relied-upon psychiatric opinion was speculative. The Court of Appeals reversed the circuit court, holding that the board's decision was supported by competent, material, and substantial evidence, including expert testimony that the condition was not permanent and that alternative treatments existed. The court noted that the board could credit one expert's view over others and that the circuit court had misapplied the substantial evidence standard in reviewing the administrative findings.