Robert G. Klausner

• In Re Katz Interactive Call Processing Patent Lit.

  District Court, C.D. California · 2011-09-29 · cited 1×

  The case involves Ronald A. Katz Technology Licensing, L.P. alleging that GEICO infringed sixteen claims across multiple related patents on interactive call processing systems. On cross-motions for summary judgment, the district court found several claims invalid as anticipated or obvious in light of prior art such as Student Registration and Moosemiller, or indefinite under 35 U.S.C. § 112, and determined that certain GEICO systems did not infringe other claims; it also granted Katz summary judgment on defenses including equitable estoppel, inequitable conduct, and best mode. The rulings rested on direct comparison of claim elements to prior art disclosures, assessment of whether references were cumulative, and evaluation of whether the specifications adequately described the claimed subject matter.

  business & regulatoryprocedure

  Read the full opinion inline ▾ (13,336 words)

• Florez v. Marshall

  District Court, C.D. California · 2009-12-02

  Read the full opinion inline ▾ (3,901 words)

• Bennett v. Felker

  District Court, C.D. California · 2009-05-29 · cited 4×

  Read the full opinion inline ▾ (2,578 words)

• Browne v. McCain

  District Court, C.D. California · 2009-02-20 · cited 10×

  Read the full opinion inline ▾ (3,505 words)

• Browne v. McCain

  District Court, C.D. California · 2009-02-20 · cited 6×

  Read the full opinion inline ▾ (4,341 words)

• Moroccanoil, Inc. v. Moroccan Gold, LLC

  District Court, C.D. California · 2008-12-09 · cited 11×

  Read the full opinion inline ▾ (4,027 words)

Affiliations