Victim in Viral Cincinnati Street Brawl Now Facing Charges

So let’s get this straight — a man gets brutally beaten in the middle of a Cincinnati street by a violent mob, footage of the attack goes viral, multiple people are indicted for felonious assault and aggravated rioting… and now he’s the one facing charges?

You read that correctly. The 45-year-old White man — who was reportedly the victim in a July 26 downtown brawl — has now been slapped with a charge of disorderly conduct. Because apparently, in 2025, if you survive a beatdown, the state still finds a way to make you the problem.

And the best part? We still don’t even know his name.

Thanks to Marsy’s Law, which allows crime victims to withhold their identities, police can’t release his name — yet they have no problem charging him with a misdemeanor for allegedly slapping one of his attackers before the mob descended on him like a pack of hyenas. So, just to recap: one slap = a misdemeanor. A multi-person beatdown, necklace theft, and a group attack captured on video = well, that depends.

This is what “justice” looks like now?

Let’s pause here. We’re talking about a violent street fight that left a man nearly dead. A mob — not one or two individuals — jumped this man and beat him to the point that we’re even having a conversation about Marsy’s Law because the attack was that severe. Seven suspects have already been charged. Charges include aggravated riot, robbery, and multiple counts of felonious assault. There’s even video evidence. And now the victim gets charged, too?

Ask yourself: why now?

Why charge him weeks after the attack? Why give the impression that a man trying to defend himself from a hostile confrontation is equally responsible for a mob-style assault?

Let’s be clear — if the racial roles in this story were reversed, it’d be plastered across every major network. It would be called a hate crime. There would be national outrage. Marches. Panels. Hashtags. But because the optics don’t fit the preferred media narrative — a White man injured by a mostly Black group — the story has been quietly pushed off the front page. And when it does reappear? It’s to say the victim might’ve deserved it.

That’s not just a legal decision. That’s cultural conditioning.

And it raises some very uncomfortable questions. Is the justice system bending over backward not to offend? Are we charging the victim just to appear “balanced”? Are prosecutors so terrified of political backlash that they’ll hang a man out to dry just to avoid bad press?

According to the charges, the alleged spark was a “verbal altercation” between the White man and a Black male. At some point, the victim allegedly slapped the other man. And then, just like that, the floodgates opened — and suddenly a crowd swarms in, pummeling him to the ground while someone else rips his necklace off his neck and then films it.

That’s not a street fight. That’s targeted chaos.

And yet… the guy bleeding on the pavement is the one facing a court date on August 26.

Meanwhile, Gregory Wright — charged with aggravated robbery — allegedly filmed the assault after stealing the man’s chain. The rest of the group? Felonious assault, aggravated rioting, the whole laundry list. But none of them are being cast as anything other than perpetrators. The victim? He’s now the news story. Convenient, isn’t it?

It almost makes you wonder what the message is here.

Because if we’ve reached a point where defending yourself — or even just getting caught on the wrong corner at the wrong time — can land you in handcuffs while the crowd that nearly kills you gets headlines buried under the fold… maybe justice isn’t blind.

Maybe it just squints harder when the 🏛️Politics get complicated.

The post Victim in Viral Cincinnati Street Brawl Now Facing Charges appeared first on Red Right Patriot.