GOP Passes New Asylum
A Republican lawmaker is pushing new legislation aimed at tightening asylum rules after a case involving a relative of a high-profile Iranian figure drew national attention. Rep. Tom Tiffany of Wisconsin introduced the…
A Republican lawmaker is pushing new legislation aimed at tightening asylum rules after a case involving a relative of a high-profile Iranian figure drew national attention.
Rep. Tom Tiffany of Wisconsin introduced the SAFER Act, short for the Stopping Asylum Fraudsters Enforcement and Removal Act, on Thursday. The proposal comes after immigration authorities arrested Hamideh Soleimani Afshar, the niece of former Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps Gen. Qassem Soleimani, along with her daughter in Los Angeles.
The case has become a flashpoint in the broader debate over how the U.S. handles asylum claims. According to federal officials, Afshar was granted asylum in 2019 but later made multiple trips back to Iran, the same country she had claimed to be fleeing.
The Department of Homeland Security has described her application as fraudulent, pointing in part to those return visits. Secretary of State Marco Rubio also weighed in, citing her public support for the Iranian regime.
Tiffany’s bill takes direct aim at situations like this. It would bar the federal government from granting asylum to individuals who return to their home country after claiming persecution there. It would also give authorities the power to revoke asylum status and potentially strip citizenship from those who are found to have done so voluntarily.
In Tiffany’s view, the issue comes down to credibility. He argues that someone who genuinely fears persecution would not willingly go back, even temporarily. His proposal reflects a broader Republican push to tighten immigration enforcement and limit what they see as abuse of the asylum system.
At the same time, the bill includes a narrow exception. If the State Department determines that conditions in a person’s home country have fundamentally changed — for example, through a legitimate transfer of power — then a return trip might not count against them. For people without a formal nationality, their case would be evaluated based on where they most recently lived.
Afshar’s immigration history has added fuel to the debate. After receiving asylum during the Trump administration, she was later granted a green card under President Joe Biden, despite records showing she had traveled back to Iran multiple times. That sequence of events has raised questions among critics about how such cases are reviewed and approved.
The proposal is unlikely to move forward without significant debate. Immigration advocates often point out that asylum cases can be complex, and that travel back to a home country doesn’t always tell the full story. In some situations, they argue, individuals may return briefly for family emergencies or other urgent reasons, even if risks remain.
Still, Tiffany and his allies say the current system leaves too much room for manipulation. By drawing a clear line, they argue, the SAFER Act would help ensure that asylum protections are reserved for people facing genuine and ongoing danger.