Meta faces federal trial over addictive algorithms
Opening arguments are set to begin in Oakland in a federal case brought by California and dozens of states accusing Meta of designing social media algorithms to keep young users hooked, at the expense of their mental health. The plaintiffs allege Meta deployed addictive features, collected undisclosed data, and trained engagement-boosting algorithms on apps like Instagram to maximize time spent on the platforms. Meta contests the claims as misrepresentations and argues the proposed penalties—potentially up to $1.4 trillion—are disproportionate, while a court has signaled skepticism toward that figure. The case specifically targets California, Colorado, Kentucky, and New Jersey under state consumer protection laws and COPPA, with the potential for substantial financial penalties and broader operational changes. This trial follows a string of related lawsuits and recent losses in New Mexico and Los Angeles, underscoring a high-stakes legal battle over the companies’ impact on minors. Outside the courthouse, advocates from Parents Rise are rallying as AGs push for stronger safeguards and potential platform changes.
Where do you stand?


